|
|
Published: 19 September, 2011
Pages: 17
Criminal trials in which the jury hears no expert testimony, propensity evidence or evidence of a prior consistent statement are the exception rather than the norm, for all of these types of evidence are potentially admissible under the Evidence Act 2006 (the Act); indeed, such are criminal law staples.
The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to update practitioners in relation to how our highest courts are dealing with these types of evidence; and second, to explain what such treatment implies for those prosecuting or defending criminal trials.
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press ‘save’ after adding each new registrant.
Health and Safety - recent developmentsPublication Date: 24-Apr-2019Authors: Greg Cain, Michael Hargreaves |
NZ $50.00 | ||
Employment Relations Act 2000Publication Date: 17-Jul-2000Author(s): Peter Churchman, Paul Roth |
NZ $45.00 |
Crown Counsel
Crown Law Office
Wellington