Your trusted CPD partner


Statutory Interpretation Update - Online CPD

NZ $255.00
Ross Carter 2016 Jason McHerron 2016
Ross Carter
Parliamentary Counsel
Jason McHerron

Package includes:

Online CPD Module  l  Booklet  l  PowerPoint Presentation

Package Fee (incl GST)

  • $205 - NZLS members and Associate members
  • $255 - Non-members

Note: Access to the online files is via your "My CPD" page. If you would like to purchase multiple packages, please contact us here.

Online CPD Module

Presentation time: 120 minutes

Statutory interpretation is of central importance to all lawyers. This vital seminar will provide a refresher for all barristers, solicitors, in-house and other lawyers who interpret and apply legislation in their private or public practice.

There have been many cases, and two major texts published Subordinate Legislation in New Zealand (2013) and Burrows and Carter Statute Law in New Zealand 5th ed (2015), since this topic was last addressed as an NZLS CLE Seminar in 2012.

It is time to stop and reflect on recent case law, to consider the current range of available tools for interpretation, and recent trends and developments in their use.

In this practical module the presenters will use examples and illustrations to cover the following topics:

Topics covered will include:
  • Statutory interpretation - what does it mean and why does it matter?
  • Text - what text is relevant, and how is text relevant, to finding meaning?
  • Purpose - why is purpose a second key driver of statutory interpretation?
  • Context - why and how does the context affect legislation’s preferred meaning?
  • Values - why and how do basic principles and values affect preferred meaning?
  • Using all the tools – how judges and others approach the task.

Please contact us if you use a dial up internet connection.


Authors: Ross Carter, Jason McHerron
Published: 15 June 2016
Pages: 190


Statutory interpretation is central to the modern private and public practice of law. It is
critical to every case affected by legislation. And nearly all cases today involve legislation.

“Statute law in its practical application is not what the Act says”, Francis Bennion reminds
us, “but what a court says (or would say) the Act means.”1 This makes studying statutory
interpretation, as Sir Kenneth Keith has noted, at least as important as studying legislative
texts: “Whoever hath an absolute authority to interpret any written or spoken laws, it is he
who is truly the Law-giver to all intents and purposes, and not the person who first wrote
or spoke them.”2 An authoritative interpretation is therefore determinative – the last word.

Few cases today involve no legislation. Justice Kirby, in common with many other judges,
has said: “If the interpretation of contractual documents is an important part of the modern
judge’s vocation, the construction of statutes is now, probably, the single most important
aspect of legal and judicial work.”3 “[T]he whole of judicial review”, for example, “could be
seen as an appendix to the law of statutory interpretation”.4 Chief Justice French in 2012
called Australia’s legal system “a statutory universe”: “it is difficult to find any legal
problem which is able to be defined and resolved solely by resort to the common law. On the other hand, it is not easy to find a statute which does not depend for its interpretation on
principles derived from the common law”.5 And the Legislation Amendment Bill introduced
in 2014 − and still awaiting a first reading before Parliament in 20166 − proposes to update
the law on the interpretation of legislation.

1 Jones (ed) Bennion on Statutory Interpretation—A Code (6th ed, 2013) at 478 (Comment on Code s 180).
2 Bishop Benjamin Hoadley (an 18th century divine), quoted in J C Gray Nature and Sources of the Law (1916) at 102, 125, and 172 (original emphasis), quoted by Sir Kenneth Keith in “Sources of Law, Especially in Statutory Interpretation” in Bigwood (ed) Legal Method in New Zealand (Butterworths, 2001) at 77 and 78.
3 Hon Justice Michael Kirby (2003) 24(2) Stat LR 95 at 96; JJ Spigelman CJ (2010) 84 ALJ 822 (judiciary’s dominant task).
4 KJ Keith Interpreting Treaties, Statutes and Contracts (OP No 19, NZCPL, Wellington, 2009) (“Interpreting T, S and C”) at v, citing RB Cooke “The Rights of Citizens” in RS Milne (ed) Bureaucracy in New Zealand (NZIPA, 1957) 84 at 96. “Determining the nature and extent of a statutory decision-maker’s obligation to consult is primarily an exercise in
statutory interpretation.”: NZ Pork Industry Board v D-G of MAF (HC, WN, CIV-2011-485-719, 3 May 2012) at [228] per Joseph Williams J. [Q]uestions of vires are ultimately questions of statutory interpretation.”: Berachan Investments Ltd v Body Corporate 164205 [2012] NZCA 256 at [31] per Arnold J ”The …submissions…rest on statutory interpretation, as does much of the law of judicial review in practice”: Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of NZ Inc v Minister of Conservation [2016] NZHC 220 at [50], Palmer J. See also Deliu v Connell [2016] NZHC 361 at [6].
5 French CJ Litigating in a Statutory Universe (18 February 2012) at 2.

PowerPoint Presentation

These are the slides included in the presentation.
Number of Slides: 85

You might also be interested in ...

Registrant Details

Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press ‘save’ after adding each new registrant.

Proceed to Checkout

Electronic Casebooks - Higher Courts - Online CPD

Publication Date: 04-May-2016

Authors: Justice Ellen France, David Goddard QC, Bronwyn McKinlay, Justice Miller, Bruce Scott

NZ $255.00

Multiple Registration

Torts Update 2016 - Online CPD

Publication Date: 14-Apr-2016

Authors: Andrew Barker, Professor Geoff McLay

NZ $255.00

Multiple Registration
freephone (within NZ)
0800 333 111

[email protected]

04 472 7837
Level 4, 17-21 Whitmore Street
Wellington 6011

DX SP 20202
PO Box 5041
Wellington 6140
New Zealand