- Track your orders
- Save your details for express checkout
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press "Save" after adding each new registrant.
On Demand Module l Electronic booklet l PowerPoint Presentation
Note: Access to the online files is via your "My CPD" page. If you would like to purchase multiple packages, please contact us here.
This is a hugely rewarding area of practice, fast growing given New Zealand’s rapidly aging population. It is a constant, delicate dance between self-determination, best interests and managing the other parties involved, with often little more than the Guidelines to assist. There are a myriad of challenges for practitioners in the PPPR space, who have to get to grips with them at speed and under scrutiny from the wider family and the Court. This module is practically focused and designed to help you navigate the issues you come across on a daily basis.
The focus of this module is directed to those who represent subject persons, who are considering applying to do so, or who practise in the PPPR space and want to gain a wider perspective and tips and tricks for tackling their hard issues.This module will include:
By completing this module you will have:
Authors: Theresa Donnelly, Alan Gluestein
Published: 11 May 2023
Pages: 114
Practice in the PPPR space is a hugely rewarding area of practice. However, it is one where there isn’t a lot of guidance for practitioners (other than the Lawyer for Subject Person’s Guidelines – attached as Appendix A). It is a matter of adapting your personal practice to new and evolving situations. It is a constant, delicate dance between self-determination, best interests and managing the other parties’ involved.
At the time that it came into force, the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (the Act) was revolutionary and seen as innovative and rights-focused with an inquisitorial process.
Section 65 of the Act provided for the appointment of lawyers to represent persons subject to the Act (subject persons). The appointment was mandatory unless the court (or registrar) was satisfied that the subject person would engage or retain his or her own lawyer. This was a problematic provision in that a subject person’s own lawyer might be a bit wary about representing the subject person when the subject person’s capacity was in issue. Problematic jurisdictional issues can arise as a result. The presenters have been involved in cases where the lawyer for the subject person has come to the view that the subject person has capacity and that the court therefore does not have jurisdiction to make any orders under the Act.
These are the slides included in the presentation.
Theresa Donnelly Perpetual Guardian Auckland |
Alan Gluestein Wyndham Chambers Auckland |