Your trusted CPD partner


Trusts and Relationship Property for Family Lawyers - Online CPD

NZ $255.00
Vanessa Bruton Isaac Hikaka
Vanessa Bruton
Partner, TGT Legal
Isaac Hikaka

Package includes:

Online CPD Module  l  Booklet  l  PowerPoint Presentation

Package Fee (incl GST)

  • $205 - NZLS members and Associate members
  • $255 - Non-members

Note: Access to the online files is via your "My CPD" page. If you would like to purchase multiple packages, please contact us here.

Online CPD Module


Presentation time: 120 minutes

Lawyers advising clients after a relationship ends need a comprehensive understanding of the trust related litigation tools available in both the Family Court and the High Court.

In addition, lawyers are increasingly caught in the cross-fire of family disputes when, on death or divorce, the family members want “their” slice of the pie.

This module will provide you with useful and practical trust-related tips to use in your practice.

When is knowledge of trust law and equitable principles essential for family lawyers?>/p?

  • At the asset and estate planning stage, when all is rosy within the family (or at least relatively functional).
  • When it all turns to custard – on death or separation, and family members want “their” slice of the pie.
  • Throughout, for lawyers who are trustees or advisors to trustees. Increasingly, lawyers are caught in the cross-fire of family disputes and themselves may become the subject of claims.

Please contact us if you use a dial up internet connection.

Electronic Booklet

Authors: Vanessa Bruton, Isaac Hikaka
Published: 27 May, 2013
Pages: 122
Electronic booklet can be downloaded from My CPD > My Online CPD after purchase.


Discretionary family trusts are prolific in New Zealand. So are relationship breakdowns. When the two collide, dealing with the fall-out is challenging for both the party seeking provision from trust assets, and the party seeking to protect the trust assets.

Trust law is a minefield for practitioners, both when initial asset-protection structures are implemented, and when they are challenged following a relationship breakdown. Much of the minefield can be explained by a lack of coherent and principled development of New Zealand trust and relationship property law. This has stemmed from tensions between:

  • respect for established internationally-applied principles of equity and trust law, which recognise the legitimate role in society of genuine trusts, and which hold trustees to the high standards required of their fiduciary position;

  • the practical reality that in New Zealand many settlors (particularly when they are also the trustees) still regard the trust property as their own and exercise complete control over it. Such control has been recognised as legitimate[1] (within limits) but has sometimes driven the Courts to achieve perceived “justice” in any particular case before them, regardless of the legal ownership of the assets at issue; and

  • the basic aim of New Zealand relationship property legislation to ensure that the fruits of a relationship are divided equally irrespective of the contributions by each party.

These tensions have been aggravated by the fact that the Family Court and the High Court each have different jurisdiction in respect of different statutes relevant to trusts and relationship breakdown.[2]

Practitioners need to be well equipped to draft and implement asset protection structures whilst all is rosy, during the early part of a relationship, or to protect assets for generations to come. Trust deeds and relationship property agreements are important documents that require specific thought and precise documentation, bearing in mind the objectives of the client, the particular fact situation and the family dynamics. Using precedents without careful thought about how they need to be tailored to each unique situation is dangerous, and can lead to trusts or agreements being unravelled or set aside when challenged.

After a relationship ends, family law, especially the interface between trusts and relationship property, is a particularly challenging area. The legal issues are complex, and what tools are available, and what court(s) have jurisdiction is often a procedural quagmire. Moreover, we deal with clients who are often demanding, highly emotional and grief-stricken. Lawyers themselves are increasingly caught in the crossfire of family disputes.

The aim of this seminar is to provide you with both the practical tools to assist family lawyers to deal with trusts – both in the setting up and running of trusts and when trusts are involved in a dispute. The seminar will consider matters of substantive law, procedure and theory in order to fully equip the practitioner to best advise clients and manage risks.

The structure of this booklet is as follows:

  1. In Chapter 1 we discuss the key principles and foundations of trusts. Knowledge and understanding of these principles is a useful tool to assist in the analysis of novel factual situations.

  2. In Chapter 2 we discuss what practitioners might have in mind at the “rosy” stage when assisting clients with their estate and asset planning. This includes discussion of some common interfaces between trusts and relationship property law.

  3. In Chapter 3 we turn to the “custard” stage – after the relationship ends. Chapter 3 sets out our view as to the appropriate approach when trusts and family law collide following a relationship breakdown, and the difficult issues around the Courts’ statutory, common law, equitable and inherent jurisdiction.

  4. In Chapter 4 we put on our “acting for the plaintiff” hat, for a plaintiff who wants provision from the trust assets. We discuss the procedural and substantive tools and tactics.

  5. In Chapter 5 we provide some observations relevant to the spouse who is also a trustee, who wants the trust structure maintained, and the assets kept for the beneficiaries, including (or principally) himself or herself.

  6. In Chapter 6 we put on our “trustee advisor” hat, and discuss the importance of the role the “independent” trustee in maintaining the integrity of the trust; and avoiding being caught in the cross-fire.

  7. In Chapter 7 we consider some of the issues that arise where a relationship ends by death, and a discretionary family trust is involved.

[1]     Kain v Hutton [2008] NZSC 61; Coles v Coles (1987) 3 FRNZ (CA).

[2]     Jurisdictional issues are dealt with in detail in Chapter 3.

      See further Mark Vickerman, “Reclaiming Relationship Property Gifted to Trusts After the Abolition of Gift Duty” in “Cradle to Grave – The Interface Between Property and Family Court”, 21 March 2011, (Auckland District Law Society Inc 2011).

PowerPoint Presentation

These are the slides included in the webinar presentation.
Number of Slides: 79

You might also be interested in ...

Registrant Details

Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press ‘save’ after adding each new registrant.

Proceed to Checkout

The PRA in the GFC - uncertainty in uncertain times

Publication Date: 19-Mar-2013

Chair: Margaret Casey. Presenters: The Hon Justice Raynor Asher, Prof Bill Atkin, The Hon Justice Patricia Courtney, Kathryn Lellman, Prof Nicola Peart, The Hon Justice Kit Toogood

NZ $70.00

Multiple Registration
freephone (within NZ)
0800 333 111

[email protected]

04 472 7837
Level 4, 17-21 Whitmore Street
Wellington 6011

DX SP 20202
PO Box 5041
Wellington 6140
New Zealand