- Track your orders
- Save your details for express checkout
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press "Save" after adding each new registrant.
On Demand Module l Electronic booklet l PowerPoint Presentation
Note: Access to the online files is via your "My CPD" page. If you would like to purchase multiple packages, please contact us here.
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) provides a framework for the determination of the division of relationship property of a married or de facto couple. Problems arise when debts or third party interests must be taken into account. This module will provide insight into the way in which third parties, including the Official Assignee of a bankrupt spouse/partner may invoke (or join in existing claims) pursuant to the PRA for their benefit.
This module will:
By completing this module you will obtain:
Authors: Toni Brown, Bret Gustafson
Published: 2 July 2024
Pages: 33
In 2020, Toni Brown and the Honourable Paul Heath KC presented NZLS CLE in short seminar Relationship Property – debts and third parties. That paper was divided into two parts:
(a) part one discussed the position of an Official Assignee with respect to relationship property proceedings; and
(b) part two discussed how third party debtors may have their interests recognised in relationship property proceedings.
In this paper, the writers (Bret Gustafson and Toni Brown) will provide an update on cases mentioned in the previous paper and discuss recent cases where claims by third parties in respect of Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) matters were determined.
In looking at the question of jurisdiction over relationship property or PRA applications, we discuss the case of Martin v Martin where the Family Court’s jurisdiction and High Court’s jurisdiction to deal with PRA claims was analysed.
Yue v Zhou and W v D and DZ are both PRA claims in the Family Court involve third party claims of a resulting trust by parents to one of the parties. The decision of W v D and DZ raises an interesting question as to the Family Court’s jurisdiction in respect of equitable remedies and defences.
These are the slides included in the presentation.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Toni Brown K3 Legal Auckland |
Bret Gustafson FortyEight Shortland Barristers Auckland |