Your trusted CPD partner |
|
You might also be interested in ...
Registrant Details
Use this window to add all the registrants you wish to register on behalf of. If you want to attend the course also, ensure you add yourself as one of the registrants. Make sure you press save after adding each new registrant.
Wills and Estate Administration after the PRAPublication Date: 11-Mar-2002Author(s): Catherine Atchison, Greg Kelly |
NZ $50.00 | ||
Adding Value to Complex Subdivison and Development ProjectsPublication Date: 23-Jul-2001Author(s): Malcolm Maclean, Ken Patterson |
NZ $45.00 |
Author(s): Peter Jones, Nevin Dawson, Kate Walker
Published: 21 July, 2003
Pages: 136
Introduction
This seminar was created for the purpose of reviewing recent legislative changes in land law, and bringing to the attention of practitioners areas of land law that have apparently been problematic through the country in recent times. It is aimed at the busy property lawyer who is expecting that at any time he or she may be called upon to protect the interests of clients in land transactions, in particular to stop the contract going wrong.
One segment of the seminar is specifically concerned with legislative changes, those under the new ss 90A to 90G of the LTA. Several other segments also address legislative changes; for example the caveats segment addresses the new fast-tracking procedure for challenge.
In this seminar we are concentrating on the law, and not procedures for electronic registration, even though the arrival of the electronic register has been the impetus for several changes.
The choice of the areas to address in this seminar was by the presenters themselves in light of very many suggestions from all over New Zealand. Our choice was conditioned in the main by suggestions arising from committee work in the NZLS Property Law Section and the various district law society property law and property law practice disputes committees. Inevitably, we have omitted a great number of problem areas, and we look forward to other seminars on many of those areas.
In endeavouring to suggest practical views of aspects of property law, we are conscious that regional differences of approach will make some of our comments seem unnecessary. By the same token, the regional differences that the three presenters could easily detect in the distant days when they commenced practice have declined markedly and are continuing to decline faster all the time.